PlainPill

GW-501516 vs LGD-4033 for performance

Short answer: For performance, users rate them about the same: 93% report improvement with GW-501516 (71 reports) and 91% with LGD-4033 (175 reports).

GW-501516 has 0 meta-analyses and 0 randomized trials on PubMed; LGD-4033 has 1 and 1.

Based on 307 reports about GW-501516 and 485 about LGD-4033. Not medical advice.

GW-501516
Substance
LGD-4033
SARM
User score4654
Verdict
Mostly positive
Mixed
Positive
of reports that state an outcome
64%51%
Reports307485
ResearchDResearch: NoneBResearch: Moderate
Meta-analyses / RCTs0 / 01 / 1
Mainly used for
Weight loss
% reporting improvement
86% (50)94% (32)
Appetite
% reporting improvement
50% (4)60% (5)
Focus
% reporting improvement
—50% (4)
Energy
% reporting improvement
95% (19)43% (21)
Sleep
% reporting improvement
0% (2)17% (6)
Anxiety
% reporting improvement
—0% (3)
Mood
% reporting improvement
100% (2)22% (23)
Performance
% reporting improvement
93% (71)91% (175)
Recovery
% reporting improvement
100% (3)100% (13)
Pain & inflammation
% reporting improvement
—0% (5)
Digestion
% reporting improvement
—50% (2)
Libido
% reporting improvement
—19% (27)
Hormones
% reporting improvement
—4% (48)
Heart & lipids
% reporting improvement
89% (19)0% (12)
Skin & hair
% reporting improvement
—0% (3)
Longevity
% reporting improvement
50% (2)—
Common side effectscancer risk, acne, fatigue, brain fogsuppression, water retention, fatigue, stomach issues
Typical dose reported20 mgNot listed
GW-501516
What a user said
“GW-501516 was a big one.”
Full GW-501516 profile →
LGD-4033
Latest review conclusion

SARMs have a positive effect on physical performance and body composition and are associated with moderate rates of mild to moderate adverse effects (AEs) and a low rate of severe AEs.

Clin Endocrinol (Oxf), 2025 ↗
What a user said
“SARMs suck dick.”
Full LGD-4033 profile →

Related comparisons

Percentages come from first-hand user reports and are not clinical outcomes. Talk to a doctor before starting, stopping or combining anything. How we rate