PlainPill

GW-501516 vs MK-2866 for weight loss

Short answer: For weight loss, users rate them about the same: 86% report improvement with GW-501516 (50 reports) and 89% with MK-2866 (79 reports).

GW-501516 has 0 meta-analyses and 0 randomized trials on PubMed; MK-2866 has 0 and 0.

Based on 307 reports about GW-501516 and 603 about MK-2866. Not medical advice.

GW-501516
Substance
MK-2866
SARM
User score4633
Verdict
Mostly positive
Mixed
Positive
of reports that state an outcome
64%39%
Reports307603
ResearchDResearch: NoneDResearch: None
Meta-analyses / RCTs0 / 00 / 0
Mainly used for
Weight loss
% reporting improvement
86% (50)89% (79)
Appetite
% reporting improvement
50% (4)62% (8)
Focus
% reporting improvement
—71% (7)
Energy
% reporting improvement
95% (19)54% (37)
Sleep
% reporting improvement
0% (2)20% (20)
Anxiety
% reporting improvement
—33% (9)
Mood
% reporting improvement
100% (2)62% (48)
Performance
% reporting improvement
93% (71)87% (189)
Recovery
% reporting improvement
100% (3)97% (60)
Pain & inflammation
% reporting improvement
—70% (27)
Libido
% reporting improvement
—31% (45)
Hormones
% reporting improvement
—4% (82)
Heart & lipids
% reporting improvement
89% (19)0% (8)
Skin & hair
% reporting improvement
—33% (6)
Longevity
% reporting improvement
50% (2)—
Common side effectscancer risk, acne, fatigue, brain fogsuppression, fatigue, insomnia, headache
Typical dose reported20 mgNot listed
GW-501516
What a user said
“GW-501516 was a big one.”
Full GW-501516 profile →
MK-2866
What a user said
“Ostarine suppresses your natural testosterone just like an aas would”
Full MK-2866 profile →

Related comparisons

Percentages come from first-hand user reports and are not clinical outcomes. Talk to a doctor before starting, stopping or combining anything. How we rate