PlainPill

GW-501516 vs RAD-140 for weight loss

Short answer: For weight loss, more users report improvement with RAD-140 — 92% of 51 reports, versus 86% of 50 for GW-501516.

GW-501516 has 0 meta-analyses and 0 randomized trials on PubMed; RAD-140 has 0 and 0.

Based on 307 reports about GW-501516 and 677 about RAD-140. Not medical advice.

GW-501516
Substance
RAD-140
SARM
User score4644
Verdict
Mostly positive
Mixed
Positive
of reports that state an outcome
64%42%
Reports307677
ResearchDResearch: NoneDResearch: None
Meta-analyses / RCTs0 / 00 / 0
Mainly used for
Weight loss
% reporting improvement
86% (50)92% (51)
Appetite
% reporting improvement
50% (4)56% (9)
Focus
% reporting improvement
—17% (6)
Energy
% reporting improvement
95% (19)41% (51)
Sleep
% reporting improvement
0% (2)3% (39)
Anxiety
% reporting improvement
—7% (15)
Mood
% reporting improvement
100% (2)37% (52)
Memory
% reporting improvement
—100% (2)
Performance
% reporting improvement
93% (71)93% (292)
Recovery
% reporting improvement
100% (3)100% (26)
Pain & inflammation
% reporting improvement
—17% (12)
Digestion
% reporting improvement
—0% (3)
Libido
% reporting improvement
—42% (38)
Hormones
% reporting improvement
—5% (62)
Heart & lipids
% reporting improvement
89% (19)6% (32)
Skin & hair
% reporting improvement
—0% (11)
Longevity
% reporting improvement
50% (2)—
Common side effectscancer risk, acne, fatigue, brain fogsuppression, hair loss, fatigue, insomnia
Typical dose reported20 mgNot listed
GW-501516
What a user said
“GW-501516 was a big one.”
Full GW-501516 profile →
RAD-140
What a user said
“I had my hopes up for RAD-140 and it is still too early to tell but I think we're moving in the right direction.”
Full RAD-140 profile →

Related comparisons

Percentages come from first-hand user reports and are not clinical outcomes. Talk to a doctor before starting, stopping or combining anything. How we rate