PlainPill

Medical Marijuana

People mainly take Medical Marijuana for sleep, anxiety, energy. Based on 4 first-hand reports and 129 meta-analyses & systematic reviews in the medical literature. Ranked #2165 of 3,539 overall.

14
User score
Mostly negative
25% positive25% mixed50% negative0% unclear

Of reports that state an outcome, 25% are positive.

Clinical research
BModerate research base
129
meta-analyses
9
RCTs
1,392
papers

What Medical Marijuana does, according to users

Of the people who reported each effect, the share who said it got better.

What the research says

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses from PubMed, with their published conclusions.

BModerate research base

At least one meta-analysis, or 5+ randomized controlled trials. The grade measures how much human research exists — read the conclusions below for what it found.

JAMA · 2015 · Meta-analysis / systematic review
Cannabinoids for Medical Use: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Conclusion: There was moderate-quality evidence to support the use of cannabinoids for the treatment of chronic pain and spasticity. There was low-quality evidence suggesting that cannabinoids were associated with improvements in nausea and vomiting due to chemotherapy, weight gain in HIV infection, sleep disorders, and Tourette syndrome. Cannabinoids were associated with an increased risk of short-term AEs.

PubMed 26103030 ↗
BMJ · 2021 · Meta-analysis / systematic review
Medical cannabis or cannabinoids for chronic non-cancer and cancer related pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials

Conclusion: Moderate to high certainty evidence shows that non-inhaled medical cannabis or cannabinoids results in a small to very small improvement in pain relief, physical functioning, and sleep quality among patients with chronic pain, along with several transient adverse side effects, compared with placebo. The accompanying BMJ Rapid Recommendation provides contextualised guidance based on this body of evidence. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://osf.io/3pwn2.

PubMed 34497047 ↗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev · 2023 · Meta-analysis / systematic review
Cannabis-based medicines and medical cannabis for adults with cancer pain

Conclusion: There is moderate-certainty evidence that oromucosal nabiximols and THC are ineffective in relieving moderate-to-severe opioid-refractory cancer pain. There is low-certainty evidence that nabilone is ineffective in reducing pain associated with (radio-) chemotherapy in people with head and neck cancer and non-small cell lung cancer. There is low-certainty evidence that a single dose of synthetic THC analogues is not superior to a single low-dose morphine equivalent in reducing moderate-to-severe cancer pain. There is low-certainty evidence that CBD does not add value to specialist palliative c

PubMed 37283486 ↗

Dosage people report

As stated by users — not a recommendation. Follow the label or your doctor.

10-15 mg edibleoccasional

Reported side effects

How often each side effect came up across all reports.

anxiety ×2laziness ×1

What users say

First-hand experiences, quoted verbatim. We show one positive and one negative where both exist.

Other options for sleep

User data from public discussions; research from PubMed. Information only, not medical advice — talk to a doctor before starting, stopping or combining anything. Data updated October 3, 2026. How we rate