PlainPill

GHK-Cu vs NMN for skin & hair

Short answer: For skin & hair, more users report improvement with NMN — 100% of 14 reports, versus 87% of 202 for GHK-Cu.

GHK-Cu has 0 meta-analyses and 1 randomized trials on PubMed; NMN has 11 and 17.

Based on 496 reports about GHK-Cu and 366 about NMN. Not medical advice.

GHK-Cu
Peptide
NMN
Supplement
Users say it helped62%helped223 reports · high confidence61%helped113 reports · high confidence
Verdict
Mostly positive
Mostly positive
ResearchCResearch: LimitedAResearch: Strong
Meta-analyses / RCTs0 / 111 / 17
Mainly used for
Skin & hair
% reporting improvement
87% (202)100% (14)
Energy
% reporting improvement
—92% (77)
Pain & inflammation
% reporting improvement
90% (31)83% (6)
Recovery
% reporting improvement
96% (27)100% (5)
Sleep
% reporting improvement
80% (5)65% (20)
Common side effectsinjection site, redness, stinging, injection paininsomnia, jitteriness, drowsiness, elevated blood
Typical dose reportedNot listed1 g / daily
GHK-Cu
What a user said
“Love it. 44 F. Totally helped even out my skin tone (Irish red cheeks), reduced wrinkles on my forehead and neck, thickened my hair which had been thinning, and grew my eye lashes.”
Full GHK-Cu profile →
NMN
Latest review conclusion

Overall, NAD⁺ augmentation shows clear biological activity, but clinical effectiveness for anti-aging or wellness outcomes remains inconclusive. Larger, well-designed randomized trials with longer follow-up and prespecified clinically meaningful endpoints are needed, particularly for parenteral approaches.

Ageing Res Rev, 2026 ↗
What a user said
“I've been using NMN for 3 years now, and I had great results with it along with many other supplements. I'm 47 and I look a lot younger and healthier than when I first started NMN.”
Full NMN profile →

Related comparisons

Percentages come from first-hand user reports and are not clinical outcomes. Talk to a doctor before starting, stopping or combining anything. How we rate