Eca Stack vs RAD-140 for weight loss
Short answer: For weight loss, more users report improvement with Eca Stack — 100% of 28 reports, versus 93% of 61 for RAD-140.
RAD-140 has 0 meta-analyses and 0 randomized trials on PubMed; the other has not been graded.
Based on 60 reports about Eca Stack and 873 about RAD-140. Not medical advice.
| Eca Stack Substance | RAD-140 SARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Users say it helped | 74%helped32 reports · medium confidence | 42%helped541 reports · high confidence |
| Verdict | Mostly positive | Mixed |
| Research | Not graded | DResearch: None |
| Meta-analyses / RCTs | — | 0 / 0 |
| Mainly used for | ||
| Performance % reporting improvement | 100% (2) | 93% (371) |
| Weight loss % reporting improvement | 100% (28) | 93% (61) |
| Energy % reporting improvement | 92% (12) | 44% (64) |
| Hormones % reporting improvement | — | 7% (76) |
| Mood % reporting improvement | — | 37% (63) |
| Common side effects | jitteriness, insomnia, increased heart, headache | suppression, hair loss, insomnia, fatigue |
| Typical dose reported | 25 mg ephedrine, 200-250 mg caffeine, 81 mg aspirin | Not listed |
Eca StackFull Eca Stack profile →
What a user said
“I used to feel hungry every two or three hours, but now I am very rarely hungry. I've lost 8 pounds since Friday while only doing cardio. I feel fine - no jitters, nausea, etc.”
RAD-140Full RAD-140 profile →
What a user said
“I did put on decent size and I feel a lot fuller. My strength and endurance has gone up tremendously. Side effects - Shedding of hair, anxiety...”
Related comparisons
Percentages come from first-hand user reports and are not clinical outcomes. Talk to a doctor before starting, stopping or combining anything. How we rate