PlainPill

Epicor

People mainly take Epicor for digestion. Based on 9 first-hand reports and 5 meta-analyses & systematic reviews in the medical literature. Ranked #1441 of 1,974 overall.

10
User score
Not enough data
0% positive0% mixed0% negative100% unclear

Of reports that state an outcome, 0% are positive.

Clinical research
BModerate research base
5
meta-analyses
7
RCTs
91
papers

What Epicor does, according to users

Of the people who reported each effect, the share who said it got better.

betterno changeworse

What the research says

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses from PubMed, with their published conclusions.

BModerate research base

At least one meta-analysis, or 5+ randomized controlled trials. The grade measures how much human research exists — read the conclusions below for what it found.

Lancet · 2012 · Meta-analysis / systematic review
Perioperative and anaesthetic-related mortality in developed and developing countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Conclusion: Despite increasing patient baseline risk, perioperative mortality has declined significantly over the past 50 years, with the greatest decline in developed countries. Global priority should be given to reducing total perioperative and anaesthetic-related mortality by evidence-based best practice in developing countries.

PubMed 22998717 ↗
J Am Coll Cardiol · 2010 · Meta-analysis / systematic review
Endovascular aortic repair versus open surgical repair for descending thoracic aortic disease a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies

Conclusion: Current data from nonrandomized studies suggest that TEVAR may reduce early death, paraplegia, renal insufficiency, transfusions, reoperation for bleeding, cardiac complications, pneumonia, and length of stay compared with open surgery. Sustained benefits on survival have not been proven.

PubMed 20137879 ↗
Minerva Cardiol Angiol · 2024 · Meta-analysis / systematic review
Accuracy of death risk prediction models for acute coronary syndrome patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Conclusion: The GRACE and CAMI risk prediction models demonstrate good accuracy for evaluating the death risk of ACS patients. The accuracy of the TIMI risk prediction model is similar to that of the REMS risk prediction model. The APACHE II, SYNTAX II, EPICOR, and CAMI risk prediction models also show good accuracy for estimating the risk of death in ACS patients, although further validation is needed due to limited evidence. For improved predictive accuracy and to help advance medical interventions, the author recommends that clinical medical staff use the GRACE model to predict the death risk of ACS pa

PubMed 38436608 ↗

Dosage people report

As stated by users — not a recommendation. Follow the label or your doctor.

500mgas reported
dailyas reported
500 mgdaily

Reported side effects

How often each side effect came up across all reports.

No side effects reported so far.

What users say

Verbatim quotes, shortened only — each links to the original discussion.

“Very good for immune support, health support.”
Source discussion ↗
“Epicor”
Source discussion ↗
“Fish Oil + Epicor + Ziziphus Jujuba...may not be the best stack”
Source discussion ↗
“High potency garlic (Kyolic, allicin extract, or both), epicor.”
Source discussion ↗
“This comment from MYSAD is enough to convince me. Plus this study.”
Source discussion ↗
Top discussions (5)

Other options for digestion

User data from public discussions; research from PubMed. Information only, not medical advice — talk to a doctor before starting, stopping or combining anything. Data updated October 2, 2026. How we rate