PlainPill

Maca vs PT-141 for libido

Short answer: For libido, more users report improvement with PT-141 — 94% of 63 reports, versus 88% of 112 for Maca.

Maca has 13 meta-analyses and 13 randomized trials on PubMed; PT-141 has 0 and 4.

Based on 299 reports about Maca and 103 about PT-141. Not medical advice.

Maca
Supplement
PT-141
Peptide
User score5156
Verdict
Mixed
Mixed
Positive
of reports that state an outcome
52%55%
Reports299103
ResearchAResearch: StrongCResearch: Limited
Meta-analyses / RCTs13 / 130 / 4
Mainly used for
Focus
% reporting improvement
90% (10)—
Energy
% reporting improvement
82% (40)—
Sleep
% reporting improvement
40% (5)—
Anxiety
% reporting improvement
43% (7)—
Mood
% reporting improvement
87% (30)67% (3)
Performance
% reporting improvement
100% (4)100% (8)
Digestion
% reporting improvement
0% (2)—
Libido
% reporting improvement
88% (112)94% (63)
Hormones
% reporting improvement
73% (15)—
Immunity
% reporting improvement
100% (2)—
Common side effectsanxiety, stomach issues, insomnia, acnenausea, headache, flushing, prolonged erection
Typical dose reporteddailyNot listed
Maca
Latest review conclusion

Conclusion: The evidence from the included studies suggests unclear effects of maca on semen quality parameters in both men experiencing infertility and healthy men. However, the total number of RCTs and the total sample size were too small to draw firm conclusions.

Front Pharmacol, 2022 ↗
What a user said
“The better experiences were with gelatinized maca powder, 20g or so in a cup and my cock was hard as El Peñón de Gibraltar.”
Full Maca profile →
PT-141
What a user said
“I take pt141 with cialis and it works great for me. Pt141 works great alone and I only need to take 1mg.”
Full PT-141 profile →

Related comparisons

Percentages come from first-hand user reports and are not clinical outcomes. Talk to a doctor before starting, stopping or combining anything. How we rate