PlainPill

CJC-1295 Dac vs CJC-1295 No Dac for weight loss

Short answer: For weight loss, more users report improvement with CJC-1295 Dac — 100% of 3 reports, versus 80% of 5 for CJC-1295 No Dac.

CJC-1295 Dac has 0 meta-analyses and 0 randomized trials on PubMed; CJC-1295 No Dac has 0 and 0.

Based on 30 reports about CJC-1295 Dac and 45 about CJC-1295 No Dac. Not medical advice.

CJC-1295 Dac
Peptide
CJC-1295 No Dac
Peptide
User score2331
Verdict
Mixed
Mixed
Positive
of reports that state an outcome
33%59%
Reports3045
ResearchDResearch: NoneDResearch: None
Meta-analyses / RCTs0 / 00 / 0
Mainly used for
Weight loss
% reporting improvement
100% (3)80% (5)
Energy
% reporting improvement
100% (2)—
Sleep
% reporting improvement
—50% (4)
Performance
% reporting improvement
0% (2)75% (4)
Recovery
% reporting improvement
—80% (5)
Pain & inflammation
% reporting improvement
—100% (2)
Hormones
% reporting improvement
100% (5)100% (2)
Skin & hair
% reporting improvement
—50% (2)
Common side effectsheadache, bad side, nausea, unspecified badhypoglycemia, fatigue, palpitations, hiccups
Typical dose reportedNot listedNot listed
CJC-1295 Dac
What a user said
“With 500mcg of CJC DAC every fourth day I have brought my IGF-1 number up to 112ug/dl.”
Full CJC-1295 Dac profile →
CJC-1295 No Dac
What a user said
“did a three month cycle, I noticed light facial flushing, increase in gut motility, increase hunger after dosing , a bit faster recovery from workout.”
Full CJC-1295 No Dac profile →

Related comparisons

Percentages come from first-hand user reports and are not clinical outcomes. Talk to a doctor before starting, stopping or combining anything. How we rate