PlainPill

CJC-1295 vs CJC-1295 Dac for hormones

Short answer: For hormones, more users report improvement with CJC-1295 Dac — 100% of 5 reports, versus 87% of 15 for CJC-1295.

CJC-1295 has 0 meta-analyses and 1 randomized trials on PubMed; CJC-1295 Dac has 0 and 0.

Based on 265 reports about CJC-1295 and 30 about CJC-1295 Dac. Not medical advice.

CJC-1295
Peptide
CJC-1295 Dac
Peptide
User score1623
Verdict
Mixed
Mixed
Positive
of reports that state an outcome
60%33%
Reports26530
ResearchCResearch: LimitedDResearch: None
Meta-analyses / RCTs0 / 10 / 0
Mainly used for
Weight loss
% reporting improvement
100% (19)100% (3)
Appetite
% reporting improvement
67% (3)—
Focus
% reporting improvement
100% (2)—
Energy
% reporting improvement
100% (7)100% (2)
Sleep
% reporting improvement
79% (34)—
Mood
% reporting improvement
100% (3)—
Performance
% reporting improvement
94% (17)0% (2)
Recovery
% reporting improvement
96% (24)—
Pain & inflammation
% reporting improvement
100% (6)—
Hormones
% reporting improvement
87% (15)100% (5)
Blood sugar
% reporting improvement
33% (3)—
Skin & hair
% reporting improvement
100% (5)—
Common side effectsinsomnia, allergic reaction, itching, flushingheadache, bad side, nausea, unspecified bad
Typical dose reportedNot listedNot listed
CJC-1295
What a user said
“Within a few weeks on cjc I noticed that I was more full, leaner, and sleep/recover was off the charts. My skin is crazy bright as well.”
Full CJC-1295 profile →
CJC-1295 Dac
What a user said
“With 500mcg of CJC DAC every fourth day I have brought my IGF-1 number up to 112ug/dl.”
Full CJC-1295 Dac profile →

Related comparisons

Percentages come from first-hand user reports and are not clinical outcomes. Talk to a doctor before starting, stopping or combining anything. How we rate