PlainPill

CJC-1295 vs CJC-1295 No Dac for recovery

Short answer: For recovery, more users report improvement with CJC-1295 — 96% of 24 reports, versus 80% of 5 for CJC-1295 No Dac.

CJC-1295 has 0 meta-analyses and 1 randomized trials on PubMed; CJC-1295 No Dac has 0 and 0.

Based on 265 reports about CJC-1295 and 45 about CJC-1295 No Dac. Not medical advice.

CJC-1295
Peptide
CJC-1295 No Dac
Peptide
User score1631
Verdict
Mixed
Mixed
Positive
of reports that state an outcome
60%59%
Reports26545
ResearchCResearch: LimitedDResearch: None
Meta-analyses / RCTs0 / 10 / 0
Mainly used for
Weight loss
% reporting improvement
100% (19)80% (5)
Appetite
% reporting improvement
67% (3)—
Focus
% reporting improvement
100% (2)—
Energy
% reporting improvement
100% (7)—
Sleep
% reporting improvement
79% (34)50% (4)
Mood
% reporting improvement
100% (3)—
Performance
% reporting improvement
94% (17)75% (4)
Recovery
% reporting improvement
96% (24)80% (5)
Pain & inflammation
% reporting improvement
100% (6)100% (2)
Hormones
% reporting improvement
87% (15)100% (2)
Blood sugar
% reporting improvement
33% (3)—
Skin & hair
% reporting improvement
100% (5)50% (2)
Common side effectsinsomnia, allergic reaction, itching, flushinghypoglycemia, fatigue, palpitations, hiccups
Typical dose reportedNot listedNot listed
CJC-1295
What a user said
“Within a few weeks on cjc I noticed that I was more full, leaner, and sleep/recover was off the charts. My skin is crazy bright as well.”
Full CJC-1295 profile →
CJC-1295 No Dac
What a user said
“did a three month cycle, I noticed light facial flushing, increase in gut motility, increase hunger after dosing , a bit faster recovery from workout.”
Full CJC-1295 No Dac profile →

Related comparisons

Percentages come from first-hand user reports and are not clinical outcomes. Talk to a doctor before starting, stopping or combining anything. How we rate