PlainPill

Nsaid

People mainly take Nsaid for focus, memory, mood. Based on 5 first-hand reports and 653 meta-analyses & systematic reviews in the medical literature. Ranked #2546 of 4,149 overall.

14
User score
Mostly negative
20% positive0% mixed20% negative60% unclear

Of reports that state an outcome, 50% are positive.

Clinical research
AStrong research base
653
meta-analyses
1,231
RCTs
16,758
papers

What Nsaid does, according to users

Of the people who reported each effect, the share who said it got better.

What the research says

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses from PubMed, with their published conclusions.

AStrong research base

3+ meta-analyses or systematic reviews and 10+ randomized controlled trials in humans. The grade measures how much human research exists — read the conclusions below for what it found.

J Gastroenterol · 2021 · Meta-analysis / systematic review
Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for peptic ulcer disease 2020

Conclusion: In patients with a history of ulcers receiving NSAID therapy, PPIs with or without celecoxib are recommended and the administration of VPZ is suggested for the prevention of ulcer recurrence. In patients with a history of ulcers receiving LDA therapy, PPIs or VPZ are recommended and the administration of a histamine 2-receptor antagonist is suggested for the prevention of ulcer recurrence.

PubMed 33620586 ↗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev · 2016 · Meta-analysis / systematic review
Manual therapy and exercise for rotator cuff disease

Conclusion: Despite identifying 60 eligible trials, only one trial compared a combination of manual therapy and exercise reflective of common current practice to placebo. We judged it to be of high quality and found no clinically important differences between groups in any outcome. Effects of manual therapy and exercise may be similar to those of glucocorticoid injection and arthroscopic subacromial decompression, but this is based on low quality evidence. Adverse events associated with manual therapy and exercise are relatively more frequent than placebo but mild in nature. Novel combinations of manual t

PubMed 27283590 ↗
BMJ Open · 2014 · Meta-analysis / systematic review
Corticosteroids and risk of gastrointestinal bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Conclusion: Corticosteroid use was associated with increased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding and perforation. The increased risk was statistically significant for hospitalised patients only. For patients in ambulatory care, the total occurrence of bleeding or perforation was very low, and the increased risk was not statistically significant.

PubMed 24833682 ↗
Sci Rep · 2024 · Meta-analysis / systematic review
A systematic review and network meta-analysis of pharmaceutical interventions used to manage chronic pain

Conclusion: Chronic pain is a public health problem that requires far more effective pharmaceutical interventions with minimal better side-effect profiles which will aid to develop better clinical guidelines. The importance of understanding ubiquity of pain by clinicians, policy makers, researchers and academic scholars is vital to prevent social determinant which aggravates issue.

PubMed 38238384 ↗

Dosage people report

As stated by users — not a recommendation. Follow the label or your doctor.

daily for a weekas reported

Reported side effects

How often each side effect came up across all reports.

No side effects reported so far.

What users say

First-hand experiences, quoted verbatim. We show one positive and one negative where both exist.

Other options for focus

User data from public discussions; research from PubMed. Information only, not medical advice — talk to a doctor before starting, stopping or combining anything. Data updated October 3, 2026. How we rate