PlainPill

Aspirin

People mainly take Aspirin for focus, heart & lipids, pain & inflammation. Based on 41 first-hand reports and 2,128 meta-analyses & systematic reviews in the medical literature. Ranked #500 of 1,974 overall.

26
User score
Mixed
15% positive12% mixed10% negative63% unclear

Of reports that state an outcome, 41% are positive.

Clinical research
AStrong research base
2,128
meta-analyses
5,064
RCTs
61,498
papers

What Aspirin does, according to users

Of the people who reported each effect, the share who said it got better.

What the research says

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses from PubMed, with their published conclusions.

AStrong research base

3+ meta-analyses or systematic reviews and 10+ randomized controlled trials in humans. The grade measures how much human research exists — read the conclusions below for what it found.

Lancet · 2025 · Meta-analysis / systematic review
Clopidogrel versus aspirin for secondary prevention of coronary artery disease: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis

Conclusion: These findings add to the evidence that clopidogrel monotherapy is superior to aspirin monotherapy for MACCE prevention with no increase in the risk of bleeding, and support the preferential use of clopidogrel over aspirin for secondary prevention in patients with established CAD.

PubMed 40902613 ↗
Am J Med · 2020 · Meta-analysis / systematic review
Aspirin for Primary Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Prevention as Baseline Risk Increases: A Meta-Regression Analysis

Conclusion: Aspirin is associated with a reduction in ASCVD when used for primary prevention; however, it is unlikely to be clinically significant given the increase in bleeding. More importantly, aspirin's treatment effect does not increase as ASCVD risk increases, as many hypothesize. There is no suggestion from these data that use of aspirin for higher-risk primary prevention patients is beneficial.

PubMed 32445718 ↗
JAMA · 2019 · Meta-analysis / systematic review
Association of Aspirin Use for Primary Prevention With Cardiovascular Events and Bleeding Events: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Conclusion: The use of aspirin in individuals without cardiovascular disease was associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular events and an increased risk of major bleeding. This information may inform discussions with patients about aspirin for primary prevention of cardiovascular events and bleeding.

PubMed 30667501 ↗
Semin Thromb Hemost · 2019 · Meta-analysis / systematic review
Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events with Aspirin: Toward More Harm than Benefit-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Conclusion: In individuals with diabetes, aspirin had no effect on nonfatal myocardial infarction (p = 0.93) or cardiovascular death (p = 0.92) and increased the risk of bleeding by 49% (p = 0.13). This meta-analysis suggests that aspirin should not be used on a routine basis in the primary prevention of cardiovascular events, especially in individuals with diabetes.

PubMed 31096304 ↗

Dosage people report

As stated by users — not a recommendation. Follow the label or your doctor.

dailyas reported
83 mgdaily
80 mgdaily
80 mgweekly
40-81mgevery third day to daily
less than 25 mgas reported

Reported side effects

How often each side effect came up across all reports.

tinnitus ×3stomach issues ×3ulcer ×2hearing loss ×2bleeding risk ×2ulcers ×2gi damage ×1bleeding ×1

What users say

Verbatim quotes, shortened only — each links to the original discussion.

Other options for focus

User data from public discussions; research from PubMed. Information only, not medical advice — talk to a doctor before starting, stopping or combining anything. Data updated October 2, 2026. How we rate