Creatine vs Semax for memory
Short answer: For memory, more users report improvement with Semax — 97% of 36 reports, versus 91% of 70 for Creatine.
Creatine has 763 meta-analyses and 2,794 randomized trials on PubMed; Semax has 0 and 1.
Based on 1,564 reports about Creatine and 490 about Semax. Not medical advice.
| Creatine Supplement | Semax Peptide | |
|---|---|---|
| User score | 53 | 55 |
| Verdict | Mostly positive | Mostly positive |
| Positive of reports that state an outcome | 67% | 65% |
| Reports | 1,564 | 490 |
| Research | AResearch: Strong | CResearch: Limited |
| Meta-analyses / RCTs | 763 / 2,794 | 0 / 1 |
| Mainly used for | ||
| Weight loss % reporting improvement | 82% (11) | — |
| Appetite % reporting improvement | 67% (3) | 50% (2) |
| Focus % reporting improvement | 92% (211) | 87% (140) |
| Energy % reporting improvement | 97% (205) | 86% (50) |
| Sleep % reporting improvement | 27% (73) | 43% (7) |
| Anxiety % reporting improvement | 62% (24) | 83% (29) |
| Mood % reporting improvement | 85% (103) | 88% (50) |
| Memory % reporting improvement | 91% (70) | 97% (36) |
| Performance % reporting improvement | 97% (320) | 100% (4) |
| Recovery % reporting improvement | 98% (62) | 100% (2) |
| Pain & inflammation % reporting improvement | 50% (4) | — |
| Digestion % reporting improvement | 0% (6) | — |
| Libido % reporting improvement | 82% (11) | 67% (3) |
| Hormones % reporting improvement | 75% (12) | — |
| Blood sugar % reporting improvement | 100% (3) | — |
| Heart & lipids % reporting improvement | 67% (6) | — |
| Skin & hair % reporting improvement | 17% (12) | — |
| Immunity % reporting improvement | — | 75% (4) |
| Longevity % reporting improvement | 100% (4) | — |
| Common side effects | hair loss, stomach issues, insomnia, water retention | hair loss, headache, brain fog, fatigue |
| Typical dose reported | daily | Not listed |
The results of the meta-analysis suggest that creatine supplementation did not significantly alter serum creatinine levels (standardized mean difference = 0.48, 95% confidence interval 0.24-0.73, P = .001, I2 = 22%), and did not alter plasma urea values (standardized mean difference = 1.10, 95% confidence interval 0.34-1.85, P = .004, I2 = 28%). The findings indicate that creatine supplementation does not induce renal damage in the studied amounts and durations.
J Ren Nutr, 2019 ↗“I actually feel a lot better. Mentally clearer and more balanced, like I have my brain back.”
“The effects have been incredible. It feels like my background distractibility has just vanished. I can lock in and focus even when my phone and other distractions are right next to me.”
Related comparisons
Percentages come from first-hand user reports and are not clinical outcomes. Talk to a doctor before starting, stopping or combining anything. How we rate