Andarine vs MK-2866 for performance
Short answer: For performance, more users report improvement with Andarine — 94% of 16 reports, versus 87% of 252 for MK-2866.
Andarine has 0 meta-analyses and 0 randomized trials on PubMed; MK-2866 has 0 and 0.
Based on 88 reports about Andarine and 789 about MK-2866. Not medical advice.
| Andarine SARM | MK-2866 SARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Users say it helped | 32%helped30 reports · medium confidence | 37%helped489 reports · high confidence |
| Verdict | Mixed | Mixed |
| Research | DResearch: None | DResearch: None |
| Meta-analyses / RCTs | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 |
| Mainly used for | ||
| Performance % reporting improvement | 94% (16) | 87% (252) |
| Weight loss % reporting improvement | 80% (10) | 88% (100) |
| Hormones % reporting improvement | — | 3% (100) |
| Recovery % reporting improvement | — | 96% (78) |
| Mood % reporting improvement | — | 66% (64) |
| Common side effects | vision issues, vision sides, night blindness, night vision | suppression, fatigue, insomnia, headache |
| Typical dose reported | Not listed | Not listed |
AndarineFull Andarine profile →
What a user said
“I've done a ostrine+s-4 cycle before and gained about 6 pounds of lean mass and lost fat.”
MK-2866Full MK-2866 profile →
What a user said
“I've taken LDG-4033 and Ostarine from Ceretropic and noticed slight psychoactive effects from both, immediately (within 30 minutes after dosing).”
Related comparisons
Percentages come from first-hand user reports and are not clinical outcomes. Talk to a doctor before starting, stopping or combining anything. How we rate